Mink v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS
BETH BLOOM, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
This cause is before the Court upon Defendant Smith & Nephew, Inc’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint (“Motion”), ECF No. [32]. The Court has considered the Motion, all supporting and opposing filings, including Plaintiff Joseph Mink’s Response (“PI. Resp.”), ECF No. [33], and Defendant’s Reply (“Def.Reply”), ECF No. [36], and has reviewed Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”), ECF No. [29], and the record in this case. Being fully advised, the Motion is GRANTED for the reasons set forth below.
I.…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Buckman Co. v. Plaintiffs' Legal CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Chaparro v. Carnival Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
- Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Laverty v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
- Wolicki-Gables v. Doctors Same Day Surgery Center, Ltd.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017