Legal Opinion

Mink v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided March 14, 2016No. Case No. 15-CIV-61210-BLOOM/VALLEPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS

BETH BLOOM, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This cause is before the Court upon Defendant Smith & Nephew, Inc’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint (“Motion”), ECF No. [32]. The Court has considered the Motion, all supporting and opposing filings, including Plaintiff Joseph Mink’s Response (“PI. Resp.”), ECF No. [33], and Defendant’s Reply (“Def.Reply”), ECF No. [36], and has reviewed Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”), ECF No. [29], and the record in this case. Being fully advised, the Motion is GRANTED for the reasons set forth below.

I.…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Buckman Co. v. Plaintiffs' Legal CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Chaparro v. Carnival Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
  5. Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Laverty v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
  2. Wolicki-Gables v. Doctors Same Day Surgery Center, Ltd.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API