Legal Opinion
Chaparro v. Carnival Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided September 5, 2012No. 11-14047PublishedCited by 829 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellants Ceferino Perez and Aida Esther Chaparro, individually and as the personal representatives of the estate of their daughter, Liz Marie Perez Chaparro (“Liz Marie”), and Amilkar Perez Chaparro (collectively “Appellants”) appeal the district court’s Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal of their complaint against Appellee, Carnival Corporation (“Carnival”), for negligence and negligent infliction of emotional distress. The district court found that dismissal was warranted because the complaint’s allegations were conclusory and insufficiently factual. We disagree and reverse the judgment of dismissal.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- East River Steamship Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Kermarec v. Compagnie Generale TransatlantiqueSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by829 opinions
- Carlos Urquilla-Diaz v. Kaplan UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
- Pablo Guevara v. NCL (Bahamas) Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
- Francis Barker, Jr. v. Hercules Offshore, Inc., etCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
- Dyan Hunt v. Aimco Properties, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
- Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. HBS International Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
824 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.