Legal Opinion

Laverty v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided June 23, 2016No. Case No. 15 C 9485PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

MATTHEW F. KENNELLY, District Judge:

Terence and Sherry Laverty1 have sued Smith & Nephew, Inc., asserting tort claims under Illinois law for negligence, strict products liability, and loss of consortium. Smith & Nephew has moved for partial judgment on the pleadings under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c). For the reasons stated below, the Court denies Smith & Nephew’s motion.

Background

The Court takes the following facts from the Lavertys’ complaint, accepting them as true for the purposes of the present motion. See Satkar Hosp., Inc. v. Fox Television…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Buckman Co. v. Plaintiffs' Legal CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. Brownmark Films, LLC v. Comedy PartnersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  5. Bausch v. Stryker Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In re Smith & Nephew Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) Hip Implant Prods. Liab. Litig.District Court, D. Maryland · 2018
  2. Gravitt v. Mentor Worldwide, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
  3. Billy Goat IP LLC v. The Billy Goat Chip Company LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
  4. Franks v. The Cooper Companies. Inc.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 2024
  5. Gilliam-Nault v. Midvest Transport CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API