Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of North Dakota v. Chinquist

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 2006No. 20050359PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

[¶ 1] C. Charles Chinquist and counsel for the Disciplinary Board object to a hearing panel report finding that Chinquist violated N.D.R. Prof. Conduct 1.5(a) and (b), 1.8(a), and 1.15(a) and (f), and recommending that Chinquist be suspended from the practice of law for 30 days and that he pay $5,289.45 for the costs and expenses of the disciplinary proceeding. We conclude there is clear and convincing evidence Chinquist violated N.D.R. Prof. Conduct 1.5(a) and (b), 1.7(a), 1.8(a), and 1.15(a) and (f). We suspend Chinquist from the practice of law for six months and one day and order that he…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. In Re BergSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  2. In Re RinellaIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. HillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989
  4. People v. ZeilingerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  5. Bourdon's CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. BureshNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  3. In RE DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST McCRAYNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  4. In Re Disciplinary Action Against ChinquistNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  5. In Re Disciplinary Action Against JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API