Legal Opinion

In RE DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST McCRAY

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 3, 2008No. 20070376PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

755 N.W.2d 835 (2008)

2008 ND 162

In the Matter of the Application for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Loren C. McCRAY, A Member of the Bar of the State of North Dakota.

Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota, Petitioner,

v.

Loren C. McCray, Respondent.

Nos. 20070376, 20070377.

Supreme Court of North Dakota.

September 3, 2008.

Paul W. Jacobson, Disciplinary Counsel, Bismarck, N.D., for petitioner.

Michael R. Hoffman, Bismarck, N.D., for respondent.

SUSPENSION ORDERED.

2Per curiam

[¶ 1] Loren C. McCray and counsel for the Disciplinary Board petition this Court for review of a hearing panel's…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

3Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Bigelow v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Federal Trade Commission v. Keith H. Gill Richard MurkeyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  5. Caldis v. Board of County Commissioners, Grand Forks CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ad Astra Recovery Services, Inc. v. HeathDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2021
  2. Ad Astra Recovery Services, Inc. v. HeathDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2021
  3. In Re Reciprocal Discipline of HaderlieNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  4. In Re Reciprocal Discipline of HaderlieNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API