Legal Opinion
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Chinquist
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided May 16, 2006No. 20050359PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
714 N.W.2d 469 (2006)
2006 ND 107
In the Matter of the APPLICATION FOR DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST C. Charles CHINQUIST, a Member of the Bar of the State of North Dakota
Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota, Petitioner
v.
C. Charles Chinquist, Respondent.
No. 20050359.
Supreme Court of North Dakota.
May 16, 2006.
Brent J. Edison, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, Bismarck, N.D., for petitioner.
C. Charles Chinquist (pro se), Fargo, N.D., respondent.
2Per curiam
[¶ 1] C. Charles Chinquist and counsel for the Disciplinary Board object to a hearing panel report finding that Chinquist…
3Cases cited15 opinions
- In Re BergSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
- In Re RinellaIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
- Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. HillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989
- People v. ZeilingerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- Bourdon's CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by4 opinions
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Gerald Anthony Lyman MoothartSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
- In re Robert Lee Vogel, BPR 023374Tennessee Supreme Court · 2016
- Amended March 6, 2015 Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Gerald Anthony Lyman MoothartSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
- Amended March 6, 2015 Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Gerald Anthony Lyman MoothartSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015