Legal Opinion

People v. Zeilinger

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 3, 1991No. 91SA166PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Per curiam

In this attorney discipline proceeding, the respondent and the assistant disciplinary counsel for the Supreme Court Grievance Committee entered into a stipulation, agreement, and conditional admission of misconduct. See C.R.C.P. 241.18. The parties recommended that the respondent receive either a private or public censure for his sexual misconduct with a client. An inquiry panel of the grievance committee accepted the stipulation and agreement and recommended that respondent receive a private censure and be assessed the costs of the proceedings. After reviewing the record and the conditional…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. BrownSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  2. People v. GibbonsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  3. Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. HillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989
  4. People v. FloresSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  5. In THE MATTER OF McDOWSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. SopherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  2. In Re BergSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. CulverCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  4. People v. GoodSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  5. In re Robert Lee Vogel, BPR 023374Tennessee Supreme Court · 2016

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API