State v. Ancira
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtBaker, J.
After James Ancira violated a no-contact order requiring him to stay away from his wife, the trial court entered a new no-contact order as a condition of sentencing, which included Ancira’s two minor children as well as his wife. Ancira objects to the inclusion of the children in the order. We conclude that the order violated Ancira’s fundamental right to parent because it was not reasonably necessary to meet the State’s legitimate objectives. Accordingly, we reverse.
I
James Ancira and his wife Andrea Valle are the parents of two minor children, ages 12 and 4. There is a long history of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- State v. RileyWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. RilesWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- In Re the Welfare of SumeyWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. Llamas-VillaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- State v. ArmendarizWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. ArmendarizWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. WarrenWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. WarrenWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- In re the Personal Restraint of RaineyWashington Supreme Court · 2010
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.