Legal Opinion

In Re the Welfare of Sumey

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1980No. 46600PublishedCited by 84 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUtter, C.J.

This appeal was certified to this court by Division Two of the Court of Appeals to determine whether the residential placement procedures of RCW 13.32 violate due process by authorizing placement of a minor without a prior finding of parental unfitness.

Sheila Marie Sumey, the petitioner at trial, is the daughter of appellants Rolin and Laura Sumey. At the time of trial in August 1978, Sheila was 15 years old. In the years preceding the initiation of this action, a number of problems had developed between Sheila and her parents. The parents set several rules for Sheila's conduct, which she did…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Parham v. J. R.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Alsager v. District Court of Polk Cty., IowaDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by84 opinions

  1. Smith v. Stillwell-SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. In Re Parentage of LBWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Washington State Coalition for the Homeless v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Carvin v. BritainWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. In re the Parental Rights to K.M.M.Washington Supreme Court · 2016

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API