Legal Opinion
In re the Personal Restraint of Rainey
Washington Supreme Court
Decided March 11, 2010No. 81244-6PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.
¶1 This case involves a challenge to a no-contact order imposed as a condition of a criminal sentence. A jury convicted Shawn Rainey of first degree kidnapping and telephone harassment. In addition to imposing a standard range sentence and community custody, *371the sentencing court ordered Rainey to have no contact with his ex-wife and daughter for the statutory maximum for his crime: life. Rainey challenges the lifetime no-contact order with his daughter as violative of his rights under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S. Ct. 2348, 147 L. Ed. 2d 435 (2000) and Blakely v. Washington,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- State v. ArmendarizWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. ArmendarizWashington Supreme Court · 2007
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- State v. ValenciaWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. ValenciaWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- In Re RaineyWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. FranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- State v. AguilarCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.