Legal Opinion

State v. Riles

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1998No. Nos. 65546-4; 65734-3PublishedCited by 135 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

In these consolidated cases Petitioners Roland Erik Riles and Richard Lee Gholston each seek review of decisions of the Court of Appeals, Division I, affirming decisions by the King County Superior Court which imposed conditions for mandatory post-release community placement under the Sentencing Reform Act of 1981, RCW chapter 9.94A. We affirm, but strike one condition from the order in each case.

QUESTIONS FRESENTED

The primary question in both cases is whether the trial courts imposed improper conditions on Petitioners during their mandatory community placement upon their release from prison.

I…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. State v. HalstienWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. RileyWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  3. City of Seattle v. EzeWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  4. People v. StollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  5. City of Tacoma v. LuveneWashington Supreme Court · 1992

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by135 opinions

  1. State v. WarrenWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. WarrenWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. BahlWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. BahlWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  5. United States v. Ronald Scott PaulCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001

130 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API