Legal Opinion

Wescoatt v. Meeker

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 30, 1944No. Civ. 7005PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHOTTKY, J. pro tem.

Plaintiff and appellant filed an action against defendant and respondent administrator after the rejection of his verified claim which read in part as follows:

• “Claimant rendered services and performed labor for and at the request of Effie M. Meeker from December, 1911, to the time of her death, which services and labor consisted of general farm and dairy work, the repairing and maintenance of improvements, the cutting and sale of wood and the making and sale of split timber, the supervision and management of farm, dairy, and business properties, and said services and…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Treadwell v. NickelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Bancroft-Whitney Co. v. McHughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Juchert v. California Water Service Co.California Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Steinberger v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
  2. In Re De Laurentiis Entertainment Group Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Debtor. Carolco Television Inc. v. National Broadcasting Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  3. Rosenberg v. WittenbornCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Rowell v. CrowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. Smith v. HageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API