Legal Opinion

United States v. Allen

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided February 23, 1989No. NMCM 88 1330PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COUGHLIN, Senior Judge:

Upon trial by general court-martial with officer members, the appellant, contrary to his pleas, was found guilty of seven specifications of disobeying a general order involving security regulations in violation of Article 92, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 892, two specifications alleging espionage activity in violation of Article 106a, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 906a, and one specification of violating the federal espionage statute of 18 U.S.C. § 793(d) alleged under Clause 3 of Article 134, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 934. Appellant was sentenced to be confined for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. HillUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  2. United States v. CzeckU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1989
  3. United States v. BoudreauxU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1988

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. AllenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
  2. United States v. AllenU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1990
  3. United States v. DunbarU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1989
  4. Allen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
  5. United States v. DiamondU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API