Legal Opinion

United States v. Diamond

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided April 26, 1990No. ACM S28255PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

BLOMMERS, Senior Judge:

In a single assignment of error, the appellant alleges he was unfairly and substantially prejudiced by improper testimony regarding rehabilitation potential. We disagree and affirm.

I

Pursuant to pleas of guilty, the appellant was convicted of larceny of military property, receiving stolen Government property, and housebreaking.* The appellant’s attack is two-fold: (1) that there was insufficient foundation for two witnesses called in the Government’s presentencing case to testify about the appellant’s rehabilitation potential; and (2) their indication that he had…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. OhrtUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  2. United States v. MontgomeryUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
  3. United States v. AntonitisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  4. United States v. SanfordUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  5. United States v. McIntoshUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. BishUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API