United States v. Diamond
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
BLOMMERS, Senior Judge:
In a single assignment of error, the appellant alleges he was unfairly and substantially prejudiced by improper testimony regarding rehabilitation potential. We disagree and affirm.
I
Pursuant to pleas of guilty, the appellant was convicted of larceny of military property, receiving stolen Government property, and housebreaking.* The appellant’s attack is two-fold: (1) that there was insufficient foundation for two witnesses called in the Government’s presentencing case to testify about the appellant’s rehabilitation potential; and (2) their indication that he had…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. OhrtUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
- United States v. MontgomeryUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
- United States v. AntonitisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
- United States v. SanfordUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
- United States v. McIntoshUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. BishUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2001