Legal Opinion

United States v. Boudreaux

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided June 30, 1988No. NMCM 74 2361RPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Before the court en banc.

COUGHLIN, Senior Judge:

This case is before us for a second time and, on our own motion, we consider it en banc.

Contrary to his pleas before the first general court-martial tried by military judge alone in February and March 1974, appellant was found guilty of five specifications of violating lawful general regulations under Charge II; one specification of signing a false official statement under Additional Charge I; and one specification of false swearing under Additional Charge II, in violation of, respectively, Articles 92, 107, and 134 of the Uniform Code of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. BullingtonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  2. United States v. WilsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Boudreaux v. United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military ReviewUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  2. United States v. BoudreauxUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
  3. United States v. AllenU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1989
  4. United States v. ShinaultU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1989
  5. United States v. BoudreauxU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API