Legal Opinion

Allen v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided May 12, 2000No. 97-243CPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SMITH, Chief Judge.

This matter is before the court on defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. Defendant contends that plaintiffs claims should be dismissed pursuant to RCFC 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(4), as barred by the six-year statute of limitations, 28 U.S.C. § 2501, or in the alternative, the waiver doctrine. After reviewing the briefs and hearing oral argument, the court hereby GRANTS defendant’s motion.

FACTS

Plaintiff, Michael H. Allen, is a retired Navy Radioman who, while living in the Philippines, was arrested and court-martialed for conducting espionage on behalf of the Government of the…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Soriano v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kiewit Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
  2. Gavin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
  3. Beekwilder v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
  4. Curry v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API