Parks v. Town of Princeton
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtWinborne, J.
Admitting the truth of the allegations of fact set forth in'the complaint, as well as relevant inference of facts necessarily deducible therefrom, as we must do in testing the sufficiency of the complaint, challenged by demurrer, Ins. Co. v. McCraw, 215 N. C., 105, 1 S. E. (2d), 369, and numerous other cases, we are of opinion that the complaint fails to state a cause of action against defendant town of Princeton.
The decisions of this Court uniformly hold that in the absence of some statute which subjects it to liability therefor, a city and town, when acting in its corporate character, or in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ramsbottom v. . RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- Whitt v. . RandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Insurance Co. v. . McCrawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Moffitt v. . AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
- Templeton v. . KelleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Millar v. Town of WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Galligan v. Town of Chapel HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- Mallard v. . Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Stephenson v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Hamilton v. Town of HamletSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.