Stephenson v. City of Raleigh
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtWiNBORNE, J.
Admitting the truth of the allegations of fact set forth in the complaint, as well as relevant inferences of fact necessarily deducible therefrom, as we do in testing the sufficiency of a complaint, challenged by demurrer, Parks v. Princeton, 217 N.C. 361, 8 S.E. 2d 217, and numerous other cases, we are of opinion that the complaint fails to state a cause of action against the defendant, City of Raleigh, a municipal corporation.
Decisions on the subject in this State uniformly hold that, in the absence of some statute which subjects it to liability therefor, a city or town, when acting in its…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- McIlhenney v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
- Millar v. Town of WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Taylor v. Knox County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
- Hill v. . Board of Aldermen of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
- James Ex Rel. James v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Koontz v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Maffei v. Incoporated Town of KemmererWyoming Supreme Court · 1959
- Galligan v. Town of Chapel HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- Orange County v. HeathSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Pigg v. BrockmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1957
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.