Legal Opinion

Templeton v. . Kelley

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 10, 1939PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

"WiNBORNE, J.

Two questions arise for determination of this appeal:

I. When taken in the light most favorable to plaintiff, is there sufficient evidence of negligence on the part of defendants to require the submission to the jury of an issue with respect thereto?

2. Upon all the evidence, is the plaintiff guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law ?

The first is answered in the affirmative, and the second in the negative.

1. In order to establish actionable negligence, “the plaintiff must show: First, that there has been a failure to exercise proper care in the performance of some legal…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ramsbottom v. . RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. Whitt v. . RandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  3. Sebastian v. Horton Motor LinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  4. Ferguson Ex Rel. Ferguson v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  5. Quinn Ex Rel. Quinn v. Atlantic & Yadkin Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Bundy v. . PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  2. Murray v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Thomas v. Motor LinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  4. Garmon v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  5. Citizens National Bank v. PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API