Legal Opinion

Ramsbottom v. . Railroad

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 4, 1905PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, J., took no part in the decision of this case. There was evidence to the effect that some time prior to the commencement of this action, and within six months, two horses owned by the plaintiffs got on the track of defendant company at a point about a quarter of a mile from a trestle, and 100 yards or little more ahead of one of defendant's trains, which was approaching from the south. The track was straight for at least a half mile back from the trestle, and at a point about 150 yards from the trestle a wagon road crossed the railroad track. The horses ran along the track about 100…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Russell v. Carolina Central R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  2. Pittsburgh Southern Railway Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1883
  3. Brewster v. Elizabeth City.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  4. Jeffress v. Town of GreenvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  5. McGowan v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1895

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. State v. . CopeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  2. McNair v. BoyetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. Pope v. Pinkerton-Hays Lumber Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
  4. Cole v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  5. Kientz v. CarltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API