Legal Opinion

Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. National Union Fire Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 15, 2005No. B176666PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RUBIN, J. —

Geoffrey Mousseau appeals from two orders awarding combined discovery sanctions of more than $20,000 to Sears, Roebuck and Co. based on Mousseau’s refusal to comply with deposition and document production subpoenas. Mousseau also appeals from an order rejecting his peremptory challenge to the discovery referee who considered the first of the two sanctions motions and recommended that the trial court impose sanctions. (Code Civ. Proc., § 170.6.) For the reasons set forth below, we dismiss the appeal as to the second sanctions motion and the peremptory challenge issue, and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Garcia v. McCutchenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. People v. HullCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Landry v. Berryessa Union School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  4. H. D. Arnaiz Ltd. v. County of San JoaquinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. Null v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Filbin v. FitzgeraldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  2. Forrest v. Department of CorporationsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  3. Sinaiko Healthcare Consulting, Inc. v. Pacific Healthcare ConsultantsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. Clement v. AlegreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. Pratt v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.California Court of Appeal · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API