Legal Opinion

Clement v. Alegre

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 23, 2009No. A123168PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KLINE, P. J.

INTRODUCTION

Twenty-three years ago, the Legislature enacted the Civil Discovery Act of 1986 (Code Civ. Proc., former § 2016 et seq.) (the Act), a comprehensive revision of pretrial discovery statutes, the central precept of which is that civil discovery be essentially self-executing. More than 10 years ago, Townsend v. Superior Court (1998) 61 Cal.App.4th 1431 [72 Cal.Rptr.2d 333] (Townsend) lamented the all too often interjection of “ego and emotions of counsel and client[s]” into discovery disputes, warning that “[l]ike Hotspur on the field of battle, counsel can become…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lewis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Deyo v. KilbourneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  3. Kohan v. CohanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  4. Obregon v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. Sinaiko Healthcare Consulting, Inc. v. Pacific Healthcare ConsultantsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Greenspan v. LADT LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  2. Ellis v. Toshiba America Information Systems., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. Krueger v. Grinnell Mut. Reinsurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  4. City of L.A. v. PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
  5. City of Los Angeles v. Pricewaterhousecoopers, LLPCalifornia Supreme Court · 2024

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API