Roschen v. Ward
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holmes
These are suits brought by dealers in eye glasses for an injunction prohibiting the enforcement of chapter- 379 of the New York Laws of 1928, which amends the Education' Law by inserting two sections, of which the material portion makes it unlawful to sell at retail in any store or established place of business ‘ any spectacles, eye glasses, or lenses for the correction of vision, unless a duly licensed physician or duly qualified optometrist, certified under this article, be in charge of and [in] personal attendance at the booth, counter or place, where such articles are sold in such store…
2Cited by224 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- City of New Orleans v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- People v. DillonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
219 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.