Legal Opinion
Towne v. Hubbard
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 16, 1999No. 92,412PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1085ORDER
¶ 1 On consideration of the paperwork on file, the court finds, concludes and orders that:(1)petitioner seeks corrective relief from a January 5, 1999 order, entered in Cause No. PG-98-570, on the docket of the District Court in Oklahoma County, by which petitioner’s lawyer, Harley E. Venters, Esq., was removed as her counsel of record and replaced by another legal practitioner of the trial judge’s selection and appointment.
¶ 2 (2) an order removing a party’s counsel (upon disqualification or for other reasons) may be reviewed on appeal brought by the client. 12 O.S.1991 § 953; Piette v.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Prock v. District Court of Pittsburg CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
- State Ex Rel. Reirdon v. County Court of Marshall CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Piette v. Bradley & LesebergSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- In Re Mize's GuardianshipSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Lebus v. CardenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
3Cited by9 opinions
- Towne v. HubbardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- Berryhill v. RhodesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
- Miami Business Services, LLC v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
- IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF BERRYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
- Steidley v. Community Newspaper HoldIngs, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2016
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.