Legal Opinion

Miami Business Services, LLC v. Davis

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 2, 2013No. 111,141PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAUGER, J:

11 Petitioner, Miami Business Services LLC (Miami), and Real Parties in Interest were involved in a joint venture. The law firm of Phillips Murrah, P.C. (Phillips) served as general counsel for Miami as well as Real Parties in Interest and their joint venture. Over the course of that joint venture, Fogg, one of the defendants, acted as the Chief Operating Officer (COO) of Miami and acted as the principal in the real party in interest business entities While COO of Miami, Fogg sought counsel from Phillips regarding issues affecting Miami's operations and for work undertaken by Real…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. RisjordSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Tweedy v. Oklahoma Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  4. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. FarrantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  5. Gladstone v. Bartlesville Independent School District No. 30Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Berryhill v. RhodesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
  2. IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF BERRYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
  3. BEYRER v. THE MULESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2021
  4. SANDERS v. TURN KEY HEALTH CLINICSSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2025
  5. BD. OF COUNTY COMM'RS v. ASSOC. OF COUNTY COMM'RS OF OKLA. SELF-INSURED GROUPSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2021

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API