Legal Opinion

In Re Mize's Guardianship

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 12, 1943No. 31060PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GIBSON, V. C. J.

This appeal is prosecuted by A. W. Lucas from a judgment of the district court of Osage county affirming an order of the county court requiring him as the alleged guardian of Elnora Mize, nee Wyrick, an incompetent, to render and present his account as such guardian.

Lucas resisted the order on jurisdictional grounds, charging that no such guardianship existed, in that the county court, for failure of personal service of notice on the alleged incompetent, acquired no jurisdiction to declare her incompetent; and further, that so far as Lucas was concerned, there never had been a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Guardianship of Di CarloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Anderson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Petroleum Auditors Ass'n v. LandisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. Colby v. JacobsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  5. Swain v. SwanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Warren v. StanfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
  2. In Re Lewis'adoptionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  3. Miske v. HabaySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
  4. In Re Guardianship of ChandosCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  5. Towne v. HubbardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API