Legal Opinion

Long v. Century Indemnity Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 17, 2008No. B195281PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PERLUSS, P. J.

— After agreeing to provide a defense to its insured under a reservation of rights, an insurer elects not to have counsel representing its own interests participate in the third party action and instead allows counsel selected by the insured to conduct and control the entire defense. Is a subsequent fee dispute between the insured’s counsel and the insurer subject to mandatory arbitration under Civil Code section 2860, subdivision (c), 1 which applies whenever an insurer, because of a conflict of interest, has a duty to provide independent (Cumis) counsel to represent its…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Schifando v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Goodman v. KennedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Brandt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Hartford Casualty Insurance v. J.R. Marketing, L.L.C.California Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Centex Homes v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. Compulink Management Center, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  4. Centex Homes v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  5. Intergulf Development LLC v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API