Legal Opinion
Intergulf Development LLC v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 24, 2010No. D055459PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McINTYRE, J.
This case presents the question whether an insurer is entitled to binding arbitration of an alleged Cumis fee dispute pursuant to Civil Code section 2860, subdivision (c) in an action by the insured against the insurer for breach of contract and bad faith where there has been no determination that the insurer had a duty to defend and the parties dispute whether the insurer satisfied that duty and its obligations under Civil Code section 2860. (See San Diego Federal Credit Union v. Cumis Ins. Society, Inc. (1984) 162 Cal.App.3d 358 [208 Cal.Rptr. 494] (Cumis), superseded by…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Buss v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- San Diego Navy Federal Credit Union v. Cumis Insurance SocietyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Wilson v. 21st Century InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Gentry v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
- Janopaul + Block Companies, LLC v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- The Housing Group v. Pma Capital InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Burgett, Inc. v. American Zurich InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2011
- Sierra Pacific Industries v. American States InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.