Legal Opinion
Fife v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided October 7, 1946No. Appeals, 144 to 150PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,.
The plaintiff has taken seven appeals in his action charging the defendants with having conspired to breach a- written contract made by him and the Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, one of the defendants, referréd to in this opinion as A. & P. The other defendants were General Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Stablemen, Helpers and Garage Men, Local Union 249, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Stablemen and Helpers of America, an Unincorporated Association, B. C. Mazon, President; M. Rosenthal, Vice President; Jerry Gradeck, Recording Secretary; Scott F. Marshall,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ballantine v. CummingsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
- Com. v. Benz., Com. v. RoutleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Rosenblum v. RosenblumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Commonwealth v. BardoplhSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Novic v. FenicsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Thompson Coal Co. v. Pike Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Burnside v. Abbott LaboratoriesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Phillips v. SeligSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- BAKER v. RANGOSSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Mark Scully v. Us Wats, Inc. Kevin O'hare, Individually and in His Capacity as President of Us Wats Aaron Brown, Individually and in His Capacity as Chairman of the Board of Directors of Us Wats Stephen Parker, Individually and in His Capacity as Executive Vice-President of Us WatsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.