Legal Opinion

Novic v. Fenics

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 3, 1940No. Appeals, 244 and 245PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Maxey,

Nove and Gabriel Novic brought separate suits against the three defendants, charging them with having unlawfully conspired to destroy plaintiffs’ interests in a certain partnership and bringing the same to ruin in a bankruptcy proceeding. The appeal in each case is from the court’s refusal to remove the compulsory nonsuit which was entered at the close of the plaintiffs’ cases.

The two suits were tried together, the pleadings and evidence being substantially identical in each case. The plaintiffs’ proof established the following: The two Novics, who were cousins,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ballantine v. CummingsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  2. Com. v. Benz., Com. v. RoutleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. Rosenblum v. RosenblumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. Canole v. AllenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  5. Commonwealth v. BardoplhSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BurdellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. BAKER v. RANGOSSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Reading Radio, Inc. v. FinkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Commonwealth v. Musser Forests, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  5. Fife v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API