Legal Opinion

Com. v. Benz., Com. v. Routley

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 25, 1935No. Appeals, 81 and 91PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Kephart,

Defendants were charged with conspiracy to defraud the County of Allegheny out of its funds or property by the use of gasoline delivered to them for their personal use and paid for by the county. At common law, a criminal conspiracy is an agreement between two or more persons with criminal intent to do an unlawful act, or to do a lawful act by unlawful means: Com. v. Richardson, 229 Pa. 609, 611. The indictment may be sustained under section 128 of the Criminal Code, as well as at common law. Conspiracy depends on the agreement and the criminal intent of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ballantine v. CummingsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  2. Commonwealth v. ByersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  3. Skelton v. Lower Merion TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. Commonwealth of Pa. v. KolskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  5. Commonwealth v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Chisley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1953
  2. Commonwealth v. BurdellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Commonwealth v. LibonatiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  4. Commonwealth v. PetrilloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  5. Fife v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API