Legal Opinion

Burnside v. Abbott Laboratories

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 20, 1985No. 589-594PublishedCited by 162 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

In this action stating five separate claims for injuries allegedly sustained by five women against all pharmaceutical companies who allegedly manufactured diethylstilbestrol (DES), in which the women alleged that the drug had been ingested by their mothers (only one alleged that she had ingested the drug herself), the trial court granted complete or partial summary judgments in favor of twenty-six named defendants whose products could not have caused the injuries sustained by the plaintiffs designated in the defendants’ respective motions for summary judgment. In an appeal from…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Thompson Coal Co. v. Pike Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Hamil v. BashlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Pocono International Raceway, Inc. v. Pocono Produce, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Payton v. Abbott LabsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  5. Sindell v. Abbott LaboratoriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by162 opinions

  1. Robertson v. Allied Signal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  2. McClure v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Crouse v. Cyclops IndustriesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Cochran v. GAF Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Skipworth v. Lead Industries Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

157 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API