Legal Opinion
Hoover v. Weesner
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided December 22, 1896No. 17,983PublishedCited by 19 opinions
From the Wabash Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcCabe, J.
The appellee sued the appellant in a complaint of three paragraphs to recover damages for trespass to real estate in the first paragraph, and to quiet the appellee’s alleged title to said real estate in each of the second and third paragraphs.
The first trial resulted in a verdict and judgment for the defendant. A new trial was granted as of right under the statute, and thereupon the complaint was amended so as to make it consist of the three paragraphs as above indicated. The complaint and issues as they stood on the first trial are not embraced in the transcript.
The issues made upon the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Cincinnati, Hamilton & Indianapolis Railroad v. MaddenIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Cargar v. FeeIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
- Chandler v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- Armstrong v. DunnIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- Indiana, Illinois & Iowa Railway Co. v. SnyderIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Perry v. Acme Oil Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1909
- Klink v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1932
- Starkey v. StarkeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
- Taylor v. SchradskyIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
- Garrett v. State ex rel. HuntsingerIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.