Garrett v. State ex rel. Huntsinger
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Madison Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtMonks, J.
Appellee brought this action against appellant, to compel him to perform an alleged duty as road supervisor. The cause was tried by a jury, and the following verdict returned: “We the jury find for the plaintiff.” Over a motion for a venire de novo, and a motion for a new trial, the court rendered judgment on the verdict in favor of appellee, and awarded a peremptory writ of mandate against appellant. The errors assigned call in question the action of the court in overruling said motions.
It is settled law that a motion for a venire de novo will not be sustained unless the verdict is so…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Central Union Telephone Co. v. FehringIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Citizens' Street Railroad v. SuttonIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
- Hoover v. WeesnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- City of Alexandria v. CutlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by13 opinions
- Kelley v. BellIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
- Miller v. StevensIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
- Hauschild v. RothIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
- Wines v. State BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
- Kendall v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.