Taylor v. Schradsky
Indiana Supreme Court
Prom Probate Court of Marion County; Frank B. Boss, Judge. Action by Hannah Taylor and others against Hyman Sehradsky and others. Prom a judgment for defendants, the plaintiffs appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtMorris, C. J.
Appellants brought an action against appellees in the Marion Probate Court to contest the will of Bennett Barnett. Trial by jury; verdict and judgment for appellees.
1. The errors assigned by appellants are the overruling of the motions, for a new trial, for a venire de novo, for judgment for plaintiffs on the verdict, and to modify the judgment. Appellants have waived their right to a consideration of the action of the trial court in overruling all the above motions except the one for a new trial, by failing to comply with Rule 22 of this court.
No attempt has been made in appellants’ brief to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Cincinnati, Hamilton & Indianapolis Railroad v. MaddenIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. McCartneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Graeter v. WilliamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
- Siebert v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Hyatt v. ClementsIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Fairbanks v. WarrumIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
- Dorsey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
- Johnson v. BradyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
- Bruce v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1927
- National Live Stock Insurance v. OwensIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.