Legal Opinion

Cincinnati, Hamilton & Indianapolis Railroad v. Madden

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1893No. 15,288PublishedCited by 53 opinions

From the Henry Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcCabe, J.

This was an action by the appellee against the appellant for a personal injury. The complaint was in three paragraphs, a demurrer to each of which was sustained as to the second, and overruled as to the first and third paragraphs; there was an answer by general denial, trial by jury, verdict for appellee, on which judgment was rendered over a motion for a new trial.

The errors assigned 'here, and not waived by failure to argue them in appellant’s brief, are the' overruling of the demurrer to the first and third paragraphs of the complaint, and the overruling of the motion for a new trial.

The…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. AdamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Indiana Car Co. v. ParkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. BayfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Ohio & Mississippi R. W. Co. v. CollarnIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Railroad Company v. FortSupreme Court of the United States · 1874

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Deal v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Hinshaw v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  4. New York Central Railroad v. MilhiserIndiana Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Bailey v. KainIndiana Court of Appeals · 1963

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API