Fleegel v. Estate of Boyles
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FABE, Chief Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Monica Fleegel sought compensatory and punitive damages from a drunk driver, Michael Boyles,1 who injured her in a car accident. The jury awarded Fleegel compensatory damages, but although it found that punitive damages were warranted, it made no monetary award for punitive damages. On appeal Fleegel appeals a number of the trial court’s evidentiary rulings, and Boyles cross-appeals the trial court’s award of attorney’s fees to Fleegel. Because the trial court did .not abuse its discretion in its evi-dentiary rulings and because it appropriately…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Malvo Ex Rel. Malvo v. J. C. Penney Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1973
- Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc. v. DayAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Dura Corp. v. HarnedAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
- Dayton Haworth v. State of Nevada, Dayton Haworth v. State of NevadaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Crittell v. BingoAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
- Wallace v. PoulosDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2012
- Button v. Haines BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
- State, Department of Transportation & Public Facilities v. MillerAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
- Matanuska Electric Ass'n v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.