Dayton Haworth v. State of Nevada, Dayton Haworth v. State of Nevada
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs-appellants are “cottage couples” employed by Nevada to supervise children who are wards of the state. “Cottage couples” or “cottage parents” are a husband- and-wife team living in a simulated home environment and supervising up to ten abused or neglected children.
Twenty-two cottage couples sued Nevada under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., seeking back wages allegedly owed for time they spent sleeping in the cottages. After a bench trial, the district court rejected all of the cottage couples’ claims, except for…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- City of Burlington v. DagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Marek v. ChesnySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Gates v. DeukmejianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- Champion Produce, Inc. v. Ruby Robinson Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Dutcher v. Randall FoodsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
- Nusom v. Comh Woodburn, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Krystal Gurule v. Land Guardian, IncorporatCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
- Goss v. Killian Oaks House of LearningDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2003
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.