Legal Opinion

Dayton Haworth v. State of Nevada, Dayton Haworth v. State of Nevada

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 30, 1995No. 93-16972, 94-16561PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiffs-appellants are “cottage couples” employed by Nevada to supervise children who are wards of the state. “Cottage couples” or “cottage parents” are a husband- and-wife team living in a simulated home environment and supervising up to ten abused or neglected children.

Twenty-two cottage couples sued Nevada under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., seeking back wages allegedly owed for time they spent sleeping in the cottages. After a bench trial, the district court rejected all of the cottage couples’ claims, except for…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. City of Burlington v. DagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  4. Marek v. ChesnySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Gates v. DeukmejianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. Champion Produce, Inc. v. Ruby Robinson Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. Dutcher v. Randall FoodsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  3. Nusom v. Comh Woodburn, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  4. Krystal Gurule v. Land Guardian, IncorporatCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
  5. Goss v. Killian Oaks House of LearningDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2003

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API