Legal Opinion

Matanuska Electric Ass'n v. Municipality of Anchorage

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 2008No. S-12568PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FABE, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Matanuska Electric Association, Inc. (MEA) appeals a ruling from the Regulatory Commission of Alaska. MEA contends that the Commission acted outside its jurisdiction when it ordered MEA to continue operating its transmission line at a voltage that exceeds the line's designed maximum, and that the Commission committed reversible error when it denied MEA permission to cross-examine a witness. Because substantial evidence aside from the challenged testimony supports the Commission's decision, we affirm.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

This appeal concerns twenty…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Adamson v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. DeShongAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Coulson v. Marsh & McLennan, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1999
  4. At & T ALASCOM v. OrchittAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Homer Elec. Ass'n, Inc. v. City of KenaiAlaska Supreme Court · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Button v. Haines BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Regulatory Comm'n of Alaska v. Matanuska Elec. Ass'n, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Regulatory Commission of Alaska v. Matanuska Electric Association, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API