Matanuska Electric Ass'n v. Municipality of Anchorage
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FABE, Chief Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Matanuska Electric Association, Inc. (MEA) appeals a ruling from the Regulatory Commission of Alaska. MEA contends that the Commission acted outside its jurisdiction when it ordered MEA to continue operating its transmission line at a voltage that exceeds the line's designed maximum, and that the Commission committed reversible error when it denied MEA permission to cross-examine a witness. Because substantial evidence aside from the challenged testimony supports the Commission's decision, we affirm.
II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
This appeal concerns twenty…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Adamson v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. DeShongAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
- Coulson v. Marsh & McLennan, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1999
- At & T ALASCOM v. OrchittAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- Homer Elec. Ass'n, Inc. v. City of KenaiAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Button v. Haines BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
- Regulatory Comm'n of Alaska v. Matanuska Elec. Ass'n, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2019
- Regulatory Commission of Alaska v. Matanuska Electric Association, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2019