Rose v. Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COMPTON, Justice.
This case concerns Irven Rose’s application for a limited entry permit. Rose appeals from the decision of the superior court which upheld a denial by the Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission (CFEC) of eleven contested points. Rose contends that the regulatory scheme under which he was denied these points is in violation of the equal protection guarantees of the Federal and Alaska Constitutions, and that the CFEC wrongfully denied him points under the “special circumstances” and “unavoidable circumstances” provisions in the regulations. We affirm.
I. FACTUAL AND…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Democratic Party of United States v. Wisconsin Ex Rel. La FolletteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Kelly v. ZamarelloAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
- Isakson v. RickeyAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
- Jager v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
- Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission v. ApokedakAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by83 opinions
- Tesoro Alaska Petroleum Co. v. Kenai Pipe Line Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1987
- Handley v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. OstroskyAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
- Balough v. Fairbanks North Star BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
- Swanner v. Anchorage Equal Rights CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.