Legal Opinion
Morningstar Water Users Ass'n v. New Mexico Public Utility Commission
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided September 21, 1995No. 21985PublishedCited by 98 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FROST, Justice.
Morningstar Water Users Association, Inc. sought an order to restrain the' City of Farmington from invading the Morningstar water supply service territory. The sole question before us is whether the New Mexico Public Utility Commission (Commission) had jurisdiction to grant the order. We review this case under SCRA 12-102(A)(3) (Cum.Supp. 1995) and NMSA 1978, Section 62-11-1 (Repl.Pamp.1993), both of which provide for Supreme Court review of final orders by the Commission. We conclude the Commission had no such jurisdiction.
I. FACTS
This case arises from the same dispute…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Tesoro Alaska Petroleum Co. v. Kenai Pipe Line Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1987
- Duke City Lumber Co. v. New Mexico Environmental Improvement BoardNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
- Marrujo v. New Mexico State Highway Transportation DepartmentNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- Wilson v. Rowan Drilling Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1950
- City of Raton v. Vermejo Conservancy DistrictNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by98 opinions
- Rio Grande Chapter of the Sierra Club v. New Mexico Mining CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2002
- Regents of the University of New Mexico v. New Mexico Federation of TeachersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
- Quynh Truong v. Allstate InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
- New Mexico Industrial Energy Consumers v. New Mexico Public Regulation CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
- Marbob Energy Corp. v. New Mexico Oil Conservation CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.