Legal Opinion

Sigman v. Stevens-Norton, Inc.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1967No. 38413PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Denney, J. † —

Respondents, Samuel F. Sigman and wife, sought by this action to recover from appellant, Stevens-Norton, Inc., mortgage brokers, and Alice J. Monk, damages arising from respondents’ delivery to Stevens-Norton, Inc., of $5,358 to be loaned to Alice J. Monk. Mrs. Monk defaulted. After trial judgment was entered against both parties. Stevens-Norton, Inc., appeals.

The action is bottomed upon alleged fraud and deceit practiced by appellant Stevens-Norton, Inc., in misrepresentations made by its agent at the time respondents’ money was entrusted to it.

The trial court made findings of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Webster v. L. Romano Engineering Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Oates v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Gaasland Co. v. Hyak Lumber & Millwork, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1953

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Stiley v. BlockWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Liebergesell v. EvansWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. HardestyWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. HardestyWashington Supreme Court · 1996

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API