Legal Opinion
State v. Jordan
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided June 4, 1986No. 31323; CA A37508PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.
Defendant appeals his conviction for unauthorized use of a vehicle. ORS 164.135. 1 He contends that the trial court erred in failing to suppress his statement to police and in denying his motion for a mistrial. We affirm.
On February 4,1984, Albany police officer Antonson interviewed defendant regarding a recent burglary and car theft in St. Helens. At trial, Antonson read the statement:
“ ‘We meet Joe’ —
— a question mark for the last name —
“ ‘at the Portland Mission drop in center where as we all, me, Frank, Ken, who came in as a friend of Joe’s, at the last minet [sic] decided to leave. We…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Michigan v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- State v. Van HooserOregon Supreme Court · 1973
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- State v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- State v. LaskyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- State v. CarrCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- State v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.