State v. Lasky
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, C. J.
After a jury trial, defendant was convicted of unauthorized use of a vehicle (UUV), ORS 164.135; second-degree criminal trespass, ORS 164.245; and third-degree criminal mischief, ORS 164.345, based on an incident in which he removed a truck and trailer from a locked lot where he had consigned the vehicles for sale. Defendant appeals, assigning error to the trial court’s allowance of the state’s in limine motion to exclude a police officer’s statement to defendant that he could retrieve those vehicles.1 The trial court concluded that the statement was not relevant. We conclude that the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Peeples v. LampertOregon Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. TitusOregon Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. AffeldOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. BellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- State v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. ShipeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- State v. Salas-JuarezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- State v. PusztaiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- State v. StricklandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- Dept. of Human Services v. M. T. J.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.