Legal Opinion

State v. Lasky

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 14, 2013No. 100330988; A147889PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, C. J.

After a jury trial, defendant was convicted of unauthorized use of a vehicle (UUV), ORS 164.135; second-degree criminal trespass, ORS 164.245; and third-degree criminal mischief, ORS 164.345, based on an incident in which he removed a truck and trailer from a locked lot where he had consigned the vehicles for sale. Defendant appeals, assigning error to the trial court’s allowance of the state’s in limine motion to exclude a police officer’s statement to defendant that he could retrieve those vehicles.1 The trial court concluded that the statement was not relevant. We conclude that the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Peeples v. LampertOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. TitusOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. AffeldOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. BellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  5. State v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. ShipeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  2. State v. Salas-JuarezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  3. State v. PusztaiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  4. State v. StricklandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  5. Dept. of Human Services v. M. T. J.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API