Legal Opinion

State v. Parker

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 24, 1992No. PO46278 CA A64548PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

In a jury trial, defendant was convicted of DUII, ORS 813.010, and failure to perform the duties of a driver when property is damaged (hit and run). ORS 811.700. On appeal, we affirm the conviction for DUII but reverse the conviction for hit and run.

Defendant raises seven assignments of error. The first deals with the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress, on which the court made minimal findings of fact. If findings are not made on all pertinent historical facts and there is evidence from which those facts could be decided more than one way, we will presume that the trial court…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State v. StevensOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. MiddletonOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State v. WaltonOregon Supreme Court · 1991

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Batzer Construction, Inc. v. John BoyerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  2. State v. ParkerOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. LarsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API