Legal Opinion

Mendenhall v. Vandeventer

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1956No. 6073PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUJAN, Justice.

Appellants, as plaintiffs, sued appellee for $28,575, for personal injuries and property damages, alleged to have been caused by a collision between the automobiles of appellants and appellee, and for medical and hospital expenses. Appellee answered by a general denial, contributory negligence, and set up a release, executed by appellants one month and nine days after the collision, in which appellants acknowledged the receipt of $1,353.75, in full settlement for all injuries and property damages resulting from the accident.

Appellants by reply admitted the execution of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co. v. WilcoxCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
  2. Farrington v. Harlem Savings BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  3. Bowie v. SorrellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1953
  4. Moruzzi v. Federal Life & Casualty Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Tocci v. Albuquerque & Cerrillos Coal Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Herrera v. C & R PAVING COMPANYNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Caudill v. CHATHAM MANUFACTURING COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. Hendren v. Allstate InsuranceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. State Ex Rel. State Highway & Transportation Department v. GarleyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Durham v. Gulf Interstate Engineering CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API