Legal Opinion

Caudill v. CHATHAM MANUFACTURING COMPANY

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 21, 1962No. 241PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

One of the questions posed by this appeal is whether the mutual mistake of fact upon which plaintiff relies is such as will permit a court exercising equity jurisdiction to annul the compromise agreement and release.

“A release executed by the injured party and based on a valuable consideration is a complete defense to an action for damages for the injuries and where the execution of such release is admitted or established by the evidence it is necessary for the plaintiff (releasor) to prove the matter in avoidance.” Ward v. Heath, 222 N.C. 470, 24 S.E. 2d 5. We have held that a release from…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Denton v. UtleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Clancy v. PacentiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1957
  3. Ward v. . HealthSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  4. Ward v. HeathSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  5. Serr v. Biwabik Concrete Aggregate Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Williams v. GlashTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Robert Del Raso v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
  3. Vernon v. Steven L. Mabe BuildersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  4. Cunningham v. BrownCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  5. Chaisson v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API