Legal Opinion

Farrington v. Harlem Savings Bank

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 21, 1939PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHubbs, J.

In this action to recover damages for personal injuries growing out of defendant’s negligence, the plaintiff’s evidence established a prima facie case. As a defense a general release was introduced in evidence. It is drawn in the broadest terms and in consideration of the payment of thirty dollars purports to release the defendant from all claims for damages, both present and future. At the close of the evidence the trial court dismissed the complaint upon the ground that the plaintiff was bound by the release. The Appellate Division affirmed, one justice dissenting.

The instrument was drawn…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wilcox v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1903
  2. Boxberger v. . N.Y., N.H. H.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
  3. Cleary v. Municipal Electric Light Co.New York Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Mangini v. McClurgNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Rossiter v. VogelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  3. Denton v. UtleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Fleming v. PonzianiNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. Gilbert v. RothschildNew York Court of Appeals · 1939

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API