Durham v. Gulf Interstate Engineering Company
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CARMODY, Justice.
We are here concerned with the refusal of-' the trial court to reopen a lump-sum judgment in. a workmen’s compensation case, which was based upon a stipulation of the parties. . i:>.
The real problem relates to whether a lump-sum judgment, fully paid and satisfied, is conclusive under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, or whether it may be reopened under a claim of aggravation or increase in disability of the workman.
The case arises under the following circumstances: Claimant incurred an injury to his head in a motor vehicle accident. He was briefly hospitalized and examined by…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hudson v. Herschbach Drilling Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1942
- Tocci v. Albuquerque & Cerrillos Coal Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1941
- Mendenhall v. VandeventerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1956
- Ritter v. Albuquerque Gas & Electric Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1943
- La Rue v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1943
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- State Ex Rel. State Highway & Transportation Department v. GarleyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
- Lewis v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Anaya v. City of Santa FeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
- Glover v. Sherman Power TongsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
- Ruiz v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.