Legal Opinion

Durham v. Gulf Interstate Engineering Company

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1964No. 7381PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARMODY, Justice.

We are here concerned with the refusal of-' the trial court to reopen a lump-sum judgment in. a workmen’s compensation case, which was based upon a stipulation of the parties. . i:>.

The real problem relates to whether a lump-sum judgment, fully paid and satisfied, is conclusive under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, or whether it may be reopened under a claim of aggravation or increase in disability of the workman.

The case arises under the following circumstances: Claimant incurred an injury to his head in a motor vehicle accident. He was briefly hospitalized and examined by…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hudson v. Herschbach Drilling Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Tocci v. Albuquerque & Cerrillos Coal Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Mendenhall v. VandeventerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Ritter v. Albuquerque Gas & Electric Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1943
  5. La Rue v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1943

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. State Highway & Transportation Department v. GarleyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Lewis v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Anaya v. City of Santa FeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Glover v. Sherman Power TongsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Ruiz v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API