Legal Opinion

Tocci v. Albuquerque & Cerrillos Coal Co.

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1941No. 4570PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SADLER, Justice.

The principal question for review is whether the trial court erred in declining to release the claimant from the terms of an agreement compromising and' settling a death claim arising under the Workmen’s Compensation Act of New Mexico following the death of her husband after sustaining injuries in the company’s- coal mine at Madrid in this state.

There is no question but that the disability suffered by the husband on September 20, 1938, consisting of a broken hip and other injuries was accidental and arose out of and in the course of his employment. The issue rendering…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Moruzzi v. Federal Life & Casualty Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Merrill v. Penasco Lumber Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Wooley v. Shell Petroleum Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Newman's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  5. Finn v. Detroit, Mt. Clemens & Marine City RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1916

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Hendrickson v. AFSCME Council 18Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2021
  2. Herrera v. C & R PAVING COMPANYNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Durham v. Gulf Interstate Engineering CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Mendenhall v. VandeventerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Ritter v. Albuquerque Gas & Electric Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1943

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API